Get API key

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro

llm.buzz and DeepInfra tie for the cheapest, and llm.buzz is the fastest provider of this model. DeepInfra costs the same as a provider on the line, for less speed.

Live providers
2
Same model, one API
Cheapest
$0.54 blended
llm.buzz
Fastest output
37 tok/s
llm.buzz
Quickest first token
1.20 s
DeepInfra
Best uptime
97.2%
llm.buzz
Output speedtok/s, median over 24 h, higher is better
llm.buzz37 tok/s
DeepInfra18 tok/s
First tokenseconds, median over 24 h, lower is better
DeepInfra1.20 s
llm.buzz3.57 s
Blended price$ per 1M tokens, lower is better
llm.buzz$0.54
DeepInfra$0.54

2 providers

Providers with their prices and measured figures. Select a column header to sort by it.
llm.buzz$0.54$0.43$0.8737 tok/stest3.57 stest97.2%test
DeepInfra$0.54$0.43$0.8718 tok/stest1.20 stest95.8%test
Speed against priceOutput speed in tok/s (median over 24 h), against the blended pricenobody beats these on both price and speed
0153045$0.30$0.40$0.50$0.60$0.70$0.80llm.buzz$0.54 blended, 37 tok/sDeepInfra$0.54 blended, 18 tok/s
Blended price, $ per million tokens (3 input to 1 output)

Customer traffic on this model is still below the publishing floor, so its figures are from llm.buzz's test requests, tagged "test".

The last 24 hours, by hour

Last 24 hours, from llm.buzz's test requests

Output speed, tok/s
0408012006:0012:0018:00Oct 27llm.buzz: 37 tok/s over the windowDeepInfra: 18 tok/s over the window
  • llm.buzz37 tok/s
  • DeepInfra18 tok/s
Data table
ProviderFrom (UTC)p50p90p99
llm.buzzOct 26, 05:0054 tok/s54 tok/s54 tok/s
llm.buzzOct 26, 09:006.0 tok/s6.0 tok/s6.0 tok/s
llm.buzzOct 26, 13:00112 tok/s112 tok/s112 tok/s
llm.buzzOct 26, 17:0031 tok/s31 tok/s31 tok/s
llm.buzzOct 26, 21:0031 tok/s31 tok/s31 tok/s
llm.buzzOct 27, 03:0037 tok/s37 tok/s37 tok/s
llm.buzzLast 24 hours37 tok/s6.0 tok/s6.0 tok/s
DeepInfraOct 26, 09:0026 tok/s26 tok/s26 tok/s
DeepInfraOct 26, 13:0015 tok/s15 tok/s15 tok/s
DeepInfraOct 26, 18:0011 tok/s11 tok/s11 tok/s
DeepInfraOct 26, 23:0037 tok/s37 tok/s37 tok/s
DeepInfraOct 27, 03:0018 tok/s18 tok/s18 tok/s
DeepInfraLast 24 hours18 tok/s11 tok/s11 tok/s
Time to first token
0 s15 s30 s45 s06:0012:0018:00Oct 27llm.buzz: 3.57 s over the windowDeepInfra: 1.20 s over the window
  • llm.buzz3.57 s
  • DeepInfra1.20 s
Data table
ProviderFrom (UTC)p50p90p99
llm.buzzOct 26, 05:002.07 s2.07 s2.07 s
llm.buzzOct 26, 09:004.29 s4.29 s4.29 s
llm.buzzOct 26, 13:0018.4 s18.4 s18.4 s
llm.buzzOct 26, 17:006.17 s6.17 s6.17 s
llm.buzzOct 26, 21:003.57 s3.57 s3.57 s
llm.buzzOct 27, 03:003.57 s3.57 s3.57 s
llm.buzzLast 24 hours3.57 s18.4 s18.4 s
DeepInfraOct 26, 09:000.83 s0.83 s0.83 s
DeepInfraOct 26, 13:000.69 s0.69 s0.69 s
DeepInfraOct 26, 18:002.48 s2.48 s2.48 s
DeepInfraOct 26, 23:001.20 s1.20 s1.20 s
DeepInfraOct 27, 03:0038.2 s38.2 s38.2 s
DeepInfraLast 24 hours1.20 s38.2 s38.2 s

Uptime

Last 72 hours, by hour
Best provider 97.2%
This model
llm.buzz
DeepInfra
  • Up: 95% or more served
  • Degraded: 85% to 95%
  • Down: below 85%
  • No data
  • From llm.buzz's test requests

How we measure

Let the router pickName the model; llm.buzz sends each request to a provider and moves to the next when one fails.